Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:18
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
NASA withdraws support for conferences - SpaceNews
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Bill Oram: Seriously, who is going to beat the Beavers? - OregonLive.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What are effective strategies to build a referral network for BPO projects?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia’s central bank cuts interest rates for first time since 2022 - Financial Times
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
I’ve tracked Amazon Prime Day for 11 years. Here are the 8 best early TV deals - CNN
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How is sex in college like with roommates and big campuses?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.